JedAIFlow · small-business spreadsheet support
Discuss a small comparison of two exports, with agreed matching rules, preserved source values, and a clear list of exceptions for human review.
Month-end comparison: $75/month founding rate (later $100/month). Rules agreed in writing before the first run. No financial files needed for your initial inquiry.
Three proposed service categories
01 · Proposed category
Review a workbook or export for inconsistent labels, duplicate rows, blank-versus-zero confusion, and structure that makes the next decision harder.
Scope firstPossible output: a documented cleanup pass or change list. No silent value changes.
View the existing cleanup service on Fiverr ↗02 · Selected direction
Compare two authorized invoice/payment or sales/payment exports with agreed keys and mappings. Preserve raw values, source rows, and exceptions for human review.
Small pilot · scope reviewed firstPossible output: a read-only exception report. Unmatched does not mean unpaid.
03 · Proposed format
Repeat an agreed comparison when new exports arrive, keeping reason codes and open questions consistent across review cycles.
Month-end comparisonOne month-end comparison per month, up to 100 rows per export. Send files by the 5th; results within 3 business days after payment and acceptance of both files. Billed monthly in advance. Cancel with 15 days' notice.
A bounded workflow
Agree the period, currency, keys, amount meaning, date contract, and allocation rules before comparing.
Run deterministic checks against two client-provided exports. Keep every source value and row reference.
Hold duplicate, ambiguous, blank, invalid, timing-sensitive, and substantive-conflict rows for a human decision.
Return the exception report and notes. No automatic correction, writeback, or source winner is selected.
Synthetic demo · fixed fictional data
This compact example shows the shape of a review queue, not a financial result. The source values and IDs are fictional.
Illustrative contract: one currency, one period, approved invoice IDs, strict decimal amounts, and ISO dates only. Timing, allocation, fees, refunds, FX, and blanks stay visible as review questions.
INV-0311 · invoice_export.csv:L18$850.00INV-0311 · payments.csv:L91$800.00Match rule: exact invoice ID within one agreed currency and period. Why held: amounts differ. A partial allocation, fee, refund, or timing issue may explain it; no automatic source winner is chosen. Next review step: a human checks the supporting rule or allocation.
Scope before files
This preview accepts no financial files. A real workflow needs an approved data-handling process before any transfer is considered.
About the practice
John · JedAIFlow
John brings experience in finance, reporting, and data consistency. This service focuses on making spreadsheets easier to inspect, comparing exports without silently rewriting source values, and documenting what needs a human decision.
Keep the original values, row references, and definitions visible for the person reviewing them.
Agree keys, dates, amounts, blanks, and exceptions before treating a row as comparable.
Use deterministic checks to surface questions, not to make accounting, compliance, or payment decisions.
Start by email
Describe the spreadsheet problem in a few lines. We can discuss the whole pilot in writing, with no call required.
Opens your email app with a short template. If it does not open, copy john@jedaiflow.com into your email service and use the checklist beside it.
Each month we compare two exports of up to 100 rows each and return a workbook of differences and exceptions.
The proposed result is a workbook of differences and exceptions with source values preserved. File requirements, data handling, price and timing are agreed before work begins.
A description is enough to start. Please do not attach financial files, passwords or personal records to your first inquiry. Your files are deleted 30 days after delivery.
FAQ
No. It means the two exports did not produce an approved match under the agreed rules. Timing, allocation, reference quality, refunds, fees, and source coverage can all matter, so the row stays with a human reviewer.
They are held unless the client has supplied an explicit allocation rule. Unallocated amounts, fees, refunds, and timing differences are recorded as review questions rather than treated as a clean match.
No. It preserves both raw values and their source references. Duplicate or ambiguous keys are quarantined, and no automatic source winner or correction is selected.
No. This preview intentionally has no upload or payment form. A real data-handling workflow must be agreed before any files are transferred.